Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP primary in Delaware. And the GOP has said that they will not be spending money on the race. And have Released The Kraken!
I shit you not, they sent Karl Fucking Rove onto Sean Fucking Hannity to badmouth Christine “Please Don’t Say ‘Fucking’ Around Me” O’Donnell. Here it is:
This must be seen to be believed. By that I mean that witnessing it is presumably necessary for belief, but has thus far proven insufficient for my own belief. Seek to 3:11, or use this link.
Boilerplate Karl Rove “or is that your real name?!?!?!” stuff. GOP voters should avoid her because she … get ready … has a “checkered past”, “misleads voters”, and is paranoid.
Few notes:
1) Mofo needs some new material, stat. Citing “unanswered questions to voters” with vague allusions to misleading statements and paranoia is a good fallback line if there is nothing better to present as evidence. But, dude: you can do so much better than that this time!
2) I am curious to see what happens to the Fox News viewer’s brain when two pink-faces he is used to following without thought or reflection are, for maybe the first time ever, out-of-step. Maybe tomorrow they’ll be in step again, and will just say they never disagreed in the first place?
3) I offered this election issues cheat sheet in Twitter: “An average American manipulating his dick1: Not Scary . A dick manipulating the average American: Scary.” Pay attention. This will be on the test, because this is already the test.
Gah, people: if this pisses you off: get active, OK?!
1. “manipulating his dick”: Christine O’Donnell opposes masturbation. You know this, right?
Masturbation, she argued, is not a moral substitute for sex. “The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery. So you can’t masturbate without lust. The reason that you don’t tell [people] that masturbation is the answer to AIDS and all these other problems that come with sex outside of marriage is because again it is not addressing the issue,” she extrapolated [don't think this is the word they meant -JHM]. “You’re just gonna create somebody who is, I was gonna say, toying with his sexuality. Pardon the pun.”
What can you even say to that? What can you even say to a Christian who says that:
* not only has her god put people in a world in which they are subjected to immense feelings of lust as … as what? a test of faith?
* and not only are the actual consequences of giving into these divinely-given urges possibly lethal
* and not only is one apparently able to commit adultery while not being married
* but relieving these urge without the risk of disease, or pregnancy, or it seems any negative side effects whatsoever
* by oneself
* is a sin against your creator
WTF?! Have you thought this through, woman?! Let’s say I were really clever, and I programmed a biological implant. I put a little computer chip behind my cat’s ear. It gives him overwhelming urges to lick the walls. Now, all the walls aside from those in his “cat tower” I cover with strychnine. I tell him that he can lick the walls inside his little apartment on the tower, because I have not covered those with poison, but if he does so I will beat him.
They. Would. Put me. In prison. And you — yes, you — would agree with that ruling.
Chickadee, even if the god you describe did exist? Which he doesn’t? That god wouldn’t be worthy of my respect. He’d be a psycho pathetic evil torturing fuck.
So, what can you even say to that kind of Christian? Well, fortunately, in sane, professional, everyday American life, you don’t need to talk to them. Which is good. But this woman is a fucking major party U.S. Senatorial candidate.
Fuck you. I want my fucking country back, you moronic motherfucking Tea Party lunatics.
Subscribe by email
Recent Comments