<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After Dark Horrorfest Reviews: Zombies of Mass Destruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcgees.org/2010/02/10/adhr-zombies-of-mass-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcgees.org/2010/02/10/adhr-zombies-of-mass-destruction/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2010/02/10/adhr-zombies-of-mass-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-63968</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgees.org/?p=1922#comment-63968</guid>
		<description>Zombie movies might be the one niche of horror where my knowledge is on par enough that I could manage a decent conversation with you (well, that and Lovecraft adaptations). My roommate could likely leave us both in the dust, but just living with him has been enough for me to pick up huge chunks of knowledge through osmosis.

&lt;I&gt;Zombieland&lt;/I&gt; is a fun movie. I don&#039;t want anyone to get the impression that I&#039;m against it, because I certainly felt that I received my money&#039;s worth from it. My only real objection is the assertion that it&#039;s higher tier than &lt;I&gt;Shaun of the Dead&lt;/I&gt;, or that &lt;I&gt;Shaun&lt;/I&gt; is somehow second-tier at all.

This might be a controversial statement around these parts, but I claim without hyperbole that &lt;I&gt;Shaun of the Dead&lt;/I&gt; does for the zombie film everything that &lt;I&gt;Kill Bill&lt;/I&gt; did for every damn thing Tarantino watched in his youth. Namely, it dissects a genre that&#039;s generally poorly considered in a way that&#039;s both accessible to the standard audience member while still sneaking in enough shout-outs to the hardcore faithful to keep the experience interesting (I saw &lt;I&gt;Shaun&lt;/I&gt; in a packed theatre, and I&#039;m confident that I was the only one who laughed at Ed&#039;s &quot;We&#039;re coming to get you, Barbara!&quot; line). In fact, I&#039;d argue that it should be no surprise that Tarantino provided commentary for &lt;I&gt;Spaced&lt;/I&gt;, or that Wright, Pegg and Frost were brought in to make &lt;I&gt;Don&#039;t&lt;/I&gt; for &lt;I&gt;Grindhouse&lt;/I&gt;; Tarantino and Wright seem to have similar levels of obsession and dedication to their source material in a way that translates beautifully on screen. 

Also, the twin tracking shots where Shaun visits the convenience store before and after the zombie infection rank as my third favorite in all of film (I&#039;m a sucker for a good tracking shot, and I believe that only &lt;I&gt;Children of Men&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Touch of Evil&lt;/I&gt; have ever done them better).

It&#039;s pretty clear that the cast and crew of both films had a blast. It comes through on screen, and it really makes both movies more enjoyable for the audience. For me, though, &lt;I&gt;Zombieland&lt;/I&gt; feels more essentially Hollywood than essentially zombie. I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a particular word to describe the feeling, but it basically feels to me that the zombies were interchangable with whatever antagonist was hot at the time; if the film had been made in the 90s, they would have fought dinosaurs; in the 80s, they would have fought ninjas.

Final Note: Running zombies are rubbish. The day that we accepted our first running zombie, we took our first fateful step towards &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099212/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vampires&lt;/a&gt; that sparkle in sunlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zombie movies might be the one niche of horror where my knowledge is on par enough that I could manage a decent conversation with you (well, that and Lovecraft adaptations). My roommate could likely leave us both in the dust, but just living with him has been enough for me to pick up huge chunks of knowledge through osmosis.</p>
<p><i>Zombieland</i> is a fun movie. I don&#8217;t want anyone to get the impression that I&#8217;m against it, because I certainly felt that I received my money&#8217;s worth from it. My only real objection is the assertion that it&#8217;s higher tier than <i>Shaun of the Dead</i>, or that <i>Shaun</i> is somehow second-tier at all.</p>
<p>This might be a controversial statement around these parts, but I claim without hyperbole that <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> does for the zombie film everything that <i>Kill Bill</i> did for every damn thing Tarantino watched in his youth. Namely, it dissects a genre that&#8217;s generally poorly considered in a way that&#8217;s both accessible to the standard audience member while still sneaking in enough shout-outs to the hardcore faithful to keep the experience interesting (I saw <i>Shaun</i> in a packed theatre, and I&#8217;m confident that I was the only one who laughed at Ed&#8217;s &#8220;We&#8217;re coming to get you, Barbara!&#8221; line). In fact, I&#8217;d argue that it should be no surprise that Tarantino provided commentary for <i>Spaced</i>, or that Wright, Pegg and Frost were brought in to make <i>Don&#8217;t</i> for <i>Grindhouse</i>; Tarantino and Wright seem to have similar levels of obsession and dedication to their source material in a way that translates beautifully on screen. </p>
<p>Also, the twin tracking shots where Shaun visits the convenience store before and after the zombie infection rank as my third favorite in all of film (I&#8217;m a sucker for a good tracking shot, and I believe that only <i>Children of Men</i> and <i>Touch of Evil</i> have ever done them better).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty clear that the cast and crew of both films had a blast. It comes through on screen, and it really makes both movies more enjoyable for the audience. For me, though, <i>Zombieland</i> feels more essentially Hollywood than essentially zombie. I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s a particular word to describe the feeling, but it basically feels to me that the zombies were interchangable with whatever antagonist was hot at the time; if the film had been made in the 90s, they would have fought dinosaurs; in the 80s, they would have fought ninjas.</p>
<p>Final Note: Running zombies are rubbish. The day that we accepted our first running zombie, we took our first fateful step towards <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099212/" rel="nofollow">vampires</a> that sparkle in sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2010/02/10/adhr-zombies-of-mass-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-63814</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgees.org/?p=1922#comment-63814</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re 0.1 stars apart at IMDB, FWIW, which is well within sampling error.  &lt;i&gt;Shaun of the Dead&lt;/i&gt; is great, but it&#039;s the Bill Murray thing that puts &lt;i&gt;Zombieland&lt;/i&gt; on the top for me.  But nothing in &lt;i&gt;Zombieland&lt;/i&gt; was anywhere near the &lt;i&gt;Shaun&lt;/i&gt; bit about the location for a romantic dinner and the impenetrable fortress being the same location.

Also, I couldn&#039;t take my eyes off &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1297015/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Emma Stone&lt;/a&gt;, and I put disproportionate weight on such things:

&lt;img src=&quot;/img/Emma.Stone.jpeg&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re 0.1 stars apart at IMDB, FWIW, which is well within sampling error.&nbsp; <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> is great, but it&#8217;s the Bill Murray thing that puts <i>Zombieland</i> on the top for me.&nbsp; But nothing in <i>Zombieland</i> was anywhere near the <i>Shaun</i> bit about the location for a romantic dinner and the impenetrable fortress being the same location.</p>
<p>Also, I couldn&#8217;t take my eyes off <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1297015/" rel="nofollow">Emma Stone</a>, and I put disproportionate weight on such things:</p>
<p><img src="/img/Emma.Stone.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2010/02/10/adhr-zombies-of-mass-destruction/comment-page-1/#comment-63813</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgees.org/?p=1922#comment-63813</guid>
		<description>I loved &lt;I&gt;Zombieland&lt;/I&gt;, but in ranking it above &lt;I&gt;Shaun of the Dead&lt;/I&gt;, you are wrong. Sometimes you&#039;re right, but this time you&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved <i>Zombieland</i>, but in ranking it above <i>Shaun of the Dead</i>, you are wrong. Sometimes you&#8217;re right, but this time you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

