Comments on: Vedder Tuesday ⅩⅥ http://mcgees.org/2009/12/22/vedder-tuesday/ Website of Joshua McGee Thu, 24 May 2012 23:51:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i> http://mcgees.org/2009/12/22/vedder-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-63669 Joshua (Site Owner) Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:29:15 +0000 http://mcgees.org/?p=1857#comment-63669 <i>My music collection is 2 for 2 on songs called Undone.</i> Mine too, but if that's not true for anyone else reading, don't sweater it. My music collection is 2 for 2 on songs called Undone.

Mine too, but if that’s not true for anyone else reading, don’t sweater it.

]]> By: Dave (Site Brother) http://mcgees.org/2009/12/22/vedder-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-63668 Dave (Site Brother) Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:59:27 +0000 http://mcgees.org/?p=1857#comment-63668 My music collection is 2 for 2 on songs called Undone. My music collection is 2 for 2 on songs called Undone.

]]> By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i> http://mcgees.org/2009/12/22/vedder-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-63667 Joshua (Site Owner) Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:56:07 +0000 http://mcgees.org/?p=1857#comment-63667 <i>some sort of auxiliary verb for futurity precede it</i> Ha! I can't frakking believe I missed a "Josh, it makes much more sense to live in the present tense" joke the first time 'round. some sort of auxiliary verb for futurity precede it

Ha!  I can’t frakking believe I missed a “Josh, it makes much more sense to live in the present tense” joke the first time ’round.

]]> By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i> http://mcgees.org/2009/12/22/vedder-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-63666 Joshua (Site Owner) Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:52:43 +0000 http://mcgees.org/?p=1857#comment-63666 <i>Witness the occupation: Corporations rule the day</i> I always hear this "rue the day". And I have time to think, "Why wouldn't the corporations be pleased with that arrangement?" before I correct it in my head. I guess "rue the day" should have ... some sort of auxiliary verb for futurity precede it (?) -- then it would work? <small><a href="http://www.mcgees.org/2009/09/01/will-this-be-funny-i-think-it-should/" rel="nofollow">OK, yes, re-treading old ground.</a></small> Witness the occupation:
Corporations rule the day

I always hear this “rue the day”.  And I have time to think, “Why wouldn’t the corporations be pleased with that arrangement?” before I correct it in my head.  I guess “rue the day” should have … some sort of auxiliary verb for futurity precede it (?) — then it would work?

OK, yes, re-treading old ground.

]]>