<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Participles not thriving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcgees.org/2009/03/06/participles-not-thriving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcgees.org/2009/03/06/participles-not-thriving/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordon Kalilich</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2009/03/06/participles-not-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-51030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordon Kalilich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/?p=1436#comment-51030</guid>
		<description>Drive, drove, driven. Anything else sounds like how &quot;thrived&quot; must sound to you.

I also thought of strive, strived, strived at first, but then I remembered that &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2008/04/06/5-years-of-the-world-of-stuff/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;strove&lt;/a&gt;&quot; and &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2008/08/18/fay-fay-go-away-come-again-another-day-or-dont/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;striven&lt;/a&gt;&quot; don&#039;t sound too funny. I would consider both schemes acceptable. This is interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drive, drove, driven. Anything else sounds like how &#8220;thrived&#8221; must sound to you.</p>
<p>I also thought of strive, strived, strived at first, but then I remembered that &#8220;<a href="http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2008/04/06/5-years-of-the-world-of-stuff/" rel="nofollow">strove</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2008/08/18/fay-fay-go-away-come-again-another-day-or-dont/" rel="nofollow">striven</a>&#8221; don&#8217;t sound too funny. I would consider both schemes acceptable. This is interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2009/03/06/participles-not-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-51029</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/?p=1436#comment-51029</guid>
		<description>What about &lt;i&gt;drive&lt;/i&gt;?  &lt;i&gt;Strive&lt;/i&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about <i>drive</i>?&nbsp; <i>Strive</i>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordon Kalilich</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2009/03/06/participles-not-thriving/comment-page-1/#comment-50940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordon Kalilich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/?p=1436#comment-50940</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just that I&#039;m a teenager, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever heard &quot;throve&quot; or &quot;thriven.&quot; The form &quot;thrived&quot; sounds fine to me, and it&#039;s what I would use. In fact, it seems that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2007/07/26/emu-sic/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I have&lt;/a&gt;. The problem, I think, is that &quot;thrive&quot; isn&#039;t a common enough word for people to immediately understand (or to understand immediately) what &quot;throve&quot; or &quot;thriven&quot; refers to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just that I&#8217;m a teenager, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever heard &#8220;throve&#8221; or &#8220;thriven.&#8221; The form &#8220;thrived&#8221; sounds fine to me, and it&#8217;s what I would use. In fact, it seems that <a href="http://www.theworldofstuff.com/archives/2007/07/26/emu-sic/" rel="nofollow">I have</a>. The problem, I think, is that &#8220;thrive&#8221; isn&#8217;t a common enough word for people to immediately understand (or to understand immediately) what &#8220;throve&#8221; or &#8220;thriven&#8221; refers to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

