<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Against type.  Really, really against type.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/</link>
	<description>Website of Joshua McGee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45285</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45285</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Scott Weiland didn’t say shit.&lt;/I&gt;

That was probably for the best, given where Scott Weiland&#039;s head was during that particular period of music history. Questions about song lyrics would probably have been answered with offers to trade sexual favors for heroin.

&lt;I&gt;Is it that whole white male thing again?&lt;/I&gt;

Could be. Alternately, it could just be that most people rightly figured that Johnny Cash could do whatever he damn well wanted, &#039;cause he was Johnny Cash. Also, even agreeing with what the Dixie Chicks had to say, I can&#039;t say that I was surprised by the response that they got. America was insane, and it didn&#039;t matter that the people denouncing the president weren&#039;t white males. &lt;I&gt;Any&lt;/I&gt; country singer, regardless of race or gender, would have gotten the same reaction to what they said. The further history takes us from 2001/2002, the happier I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Scott Weiland didn’t say shit.</i></p>
<p>That was probably for the best, given where Scott Weiland&#8217;s head was during that particular period of music history. Questions about song lyrics would probably have been answered with offers to trade sexual favors for heroin.</p>
<p><i>Is it that whole white male thing again?</i></p>
<p>Could be. Alternately, it could just be that most people rightly figured that Johnny Cash could do whatever he damn well wanted, &#8217;cause he was Johnny Cash. Also, even agreeing with what the Dixie Chicks had to say, I can&#8217;t say that I was surprised by the response that they got. America was insane, and it didn&#8217;t matter that the people denouncing the president weren&#8217;t white males. <i>Any</i> country singer, regardless of race or gender, would have gotten the same reaction to what they said. The further history takes us from 2001/2002, the happier I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45284</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45284</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It is to your credit as a sensitive liberal dude that you spelled “Polack” incorrectly.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, uh, thanks, I guess.  Yeah, don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen that in print.  Firefox doesn&#039;t like that one, go figure.  I should have had a clue when Pollock wasn&#039;t flagged.  Anyway, I fixed your html.

&lt;i&gt;Scott Weiland doesn’t say &quot;I didn’t do that, I just want to do it sometimes.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Scott Weiland didn&#039;t say &lt;i&gt;shit&lt;/i&gt;.  Which was kind of my point.  It was left to his band-mate to try to fill in the gaps &#8212; ineptly, at that.  And I don&#039;t think T was saying &quot;It&#039;s OK to shoot a cop.&quot;  That&#039;s not how I read it.  He didn&#039;t say, &quot;If things don&#039;t get better, niggas are going to have to start capping some pigs.&quot;  I&#039;m pretty sure that theoretical line has too many &lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;s in it (ha!).  The bassist for Rage Against the Machine, however, &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; quoted as saying &quot;If things don&#039;t change, people are going to have to start mailing bombs or something.&quot;  And again, I had Rage albums.

But the blind eye to Johnny Cash &#8212; with his drug addiction, imprisonment, outreach to convicts, violent lyrics, and everything &#8212; has always really thrown me.  The Dixie Chicks said something &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; more sedate than &lt;i&gt;shooting a man in Reno&lt;/i&gt;, and people were lining up to denounce them.  Is it that whole white male thing again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is to your credit as a sensitive liberal dude that you spelled “Polack” incorrectly.</i></p>
<p>Oh, uh, thanks, I guess.&nbsp; Yeah, don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen that in print.&nbsp; Firefox doesn&#8217;t like that one, go figure.&nbsp; I should have had a clue when Pollock wasn&#8217;t flagged.&nbsp; Anyway, I fixed your html.</p>
<p><i>Scott Weiland doesn’t say &#8220;I didn’t do that, I just want to do it sometimes.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Scott Weiland didn&#8217;t say <i>shit</i>.&nbsp; Which was kind of my point.&nbsp; It was left to his band-mate to try to fill in the gaps &mdash; ineptly, at that.&nbsp; And I don&#8217;t think T was saying &#8220;It&#8217;s OK to shoot a cop.&#8221;&nbsp; That&#8217;s not how I read it.&nbsp; He didn&#8217;t say, &#8220;If things don&#8217;t get better, niggas are going to have to start capping some pigs.&#8221;&nbsp; I&#8217;m pretty sure that theoretical line has too many <i>g</i>s in it (ha!).&nbsp; The bassist for Rage Against the Machine, however, <i>was</i> quoted as saying &#8220;If things don&#8217;t change, people are going to have to start mailing bombs or something.&#8221;&nbsp; And again, I had Rage albums.</p>
<p>But the blind eye to Johnny Cash &mdash; with his drug addiction, imprisonment, outreach to convicts, violent lyrics, and everything &mdash; has always really thrown me.&nbsp; The Dixie Chicks said something <i>way</i> more sedate than <i>shooting a man in Reno</i>, and people were lining up to denounce them.&nbsp; Is it that whole white male thing again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45282</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45282</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the difference between &lt;I&gt;Cop Killer&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Sex Type Thing&lt;/I&gt;.

Both artists are playing a role, obviously, but the role that Ice T plays is cast in a positive light by the artist, while the role that Weiland plays is cast in a negative light by the artist. Scott Weiland doesn&#039;t say &quot;I didn&#039;t do that, I just &lt;I&gt;want&lt;/I&gt; to do it sometimes.&quot;

In either case, I think that the fury over &lt;I&gt;Cop Killer&lt;/I&gt; was wildly misplaced. You never saw white politicians lining up to denounce Johnny Cash for shooting a man in Reno (just to watch him die, no less!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the difference between <i>Cop Killer</i> and <i>Sex Type Thing</i>.</p>
<p>Both artists are playing a role, obviously, but the role that Ice T plays is cast in a positive light by the artist, while the role that Weiland plays is cast in a negative light by the artist. Scott Weiland doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;I didn&#8217;t do that, I just <i>want</i> to do it sometimes.&#8221;</p>
<p>In either case, I think that the fury over <i>Cop Killer</i> was wildly misplaced. You never saw white politicians lining up to denounce Johnny Cash for shooting a man in Reno (just to watch him die, no less!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45278</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45278</guid>
		<description>And, of course, I mess up the html. 

Try to be a smartass, and you end up looking like a dumbass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, of course, I mess up the html. </p>
<p>Try to be a smartass, and you end up looking like a dumbass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mike</title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45277</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45277</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Anyway, Belzer tells a “Pollock” joke&lt;/I&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pollock&lt;/a&gt; joke?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_pollock&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pollock&lt;/a&gt; joke?

It is to your credit as a sensitive liberal dude that you spelled &quot;Polack&quot; incorrectly. I&#039;m totally going to make jokes about it on my comedy &lt;I&gt;alblum&lt;/I&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Anyway, Belzer tells a “Pollock” joke</i></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock" rel="nofollow">Pollock</a> joke?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_pollock" rel="nofollow">Pollock</a> joke?</p>
<p>It is to your credit as a sensitive liberal dude that you spelled &#8220;Polack&#8221; incorrectly. I&#8217;m totally going to make jokes about it on my comedy <i>alblum</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></title>
		<link>http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/comment-page-1/#comment-45263</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua <i>(Site Owner)</i></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcgees.org/2008/02/11/against-type/#comment-45263</guid>
		<description>And &quot;Hi!&quot; to all the email subscribers who read the notification email that stops towards the end of T&#039;s lyrics and though, &lt;i&gt;&lt;abbr title=&quot;Think about it.  For, like, two seconds.&quot;&gt;WTF&lt;/abbr&gt; is going on at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcgees.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mcgees.org&lt;/a&gt;?!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And &#8220;Hi!&#8221; to all the email subscribers who read the notification email that stops towards the end of T&#8217;s lyrics and though, <i><abbr title="Think about it.&nbsp; For, like, two seconds.">WTF</abbr> is going on at <a href="http://www.mcgees.org" rel="nofollow">mcgees.org</a>?!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

